About
Friends
-
Loading…giania 1 day ago -
Loading…upsidedown over 2 years ago -
Loading…stylesyndicate 4 months ago -
Loading…erstgeborener 3 months ago -
Loading…catanastrategy 4 days ago -
Loading…kreativbetrunken about 1 year ago -
Loading…boaa 1 day ago -
Loading…fefe about 5 hours ago -
Loading…telofy about 5 hours ago -
Loading…wiosanna 12 months ago -
Loading…lasarina 3 months ago -
Loading…wandel about 21 hours ago -
Loading…minna about 6 hours ago -
Loading…proximity about 9 hours ago -
Loading…astrid about 10 hours ago - +49
Click here to check if anything new just came in.
September 20 2010
Recent Reading: Superfreakonomics
Train rides really help advancing in your reading list. This time I was accompanied by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner’s follow-up to their bestseller Freakonomics: Superfreakonomics
.
The book contains a couple of gems of information that will always come handy at parties, like the fact that after sex changes men (who originally used to be women) will earn more than before, while their newly female counterparts will see their salaries drop.
The main theme of Superfreakonomics is the power and importance of incentives. The question why people do things or how they could be motivated to do things is the red thread along which Levitt and Dubner shed light at subjects like prostitution, altruism, global warming, terrorism and simple solutions. For instance, the best motivation for hospital staff and doctors to wash their hands is to have them culture their hands’ surfaces in petri dishes and display the colorful results on all screen savers in the clinic. In that aspect Superfreakonomics is stuffed full with the interesting.
When Dubner (I believe that’s his shtick) drifts off to see whether the infamous Kitty Genovese incident might have been inaccurately reported or covers many different viewpoints and ideas on global warming, plus some science fiction sounding solutions, I was not too excited.
The freakonomicists are most interesting when they let data and science reveal the unexpected: how for instance TV did more to empower women in India than all prior government interventions. The short last chapter is a highlight: it describes Keith Chen’s experiment in which capuchin monkeys were taught the concept of money (exchanging coins for food). It resulted in the monkeys behaving like stock-market investors at the prospect of loss, but also in theft, greed and …wait for it… prostitution. The experiment was halted because it was feared that it would damage the monkey’s social structure.
In summary, Superfreakonomics is a good, entertaining and insightful read, though not as great as the first book. I still read it in one go.
July 27 2010
You get the answers you ask for.
Yesterday, I learned that Henri Ford’s classic “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”-soundbite is usually quoted when people prepare to lash out at market research.
Funny, I always understood it as a criticism of stupid questions.
You always get the answers you ask for. Or deserve.
That is all.
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...

